On Apr 16, 2010, at 4:47 PM, Steven Peterson wrote: > We don't have a way of answering > the charge of relativism other than by attacking the philosophical > premises from which it makes sense to ask "Is the Quality in the > subject or the object?" and "is it absolute or merely relative?", but > I think we should deny it nevertheless just as we deny being > absolutists.
Hey Steve, It doesn't have to be bifurcated into absolute OR relative. The Buddhist's might say it as Emptiness is form, form is Emptiness. A MoQ'ist might say that Quality is sq, sq is Quality. Marsha ___ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
