[John] That's the problem with Quality in an academic matrix, and it's not a problem with Quality, it's a problem with the academic matrix.
[Arlo] I think you are conflating Quality with the MOQ. Certainly, one cannot (nor should try) to constrain "Quality in an academic matrix". I think the post I just wrote in the "Philolosophology" thread addresses this, as you seem to be using the MOQ as a placeholder for the Quality-in-Living view as described in ZMM. No one, certainly not me, would say that Quality is something the academics "can smack their lips on like some bon-bon" (or something like that). But the MOQ IS an intellectual pattern (again, despite Bo's mired denial), and as such is about "expanding rationality", which is an intellectual endeavor, one that is best served by the "academic" discourse of people like you, Ant, Granger, DMB, Matt, Steve and others. ZMM is about planting your garden with care, gumption and Quality. The MOQ is about an expanded rationality for reinterpreting experience, an intellectual endeavor. Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
