Pirsig: "Remember that the central reality of the MOQ is not an object or a subject or anything else. It is understood by direct experience only and NOT BE REASONING OF ANY KIND.(LC, Note 132 - emphasis added)
On 17 Apr 2010 at 11:05, ARLO J BENSINGER JR wrote: > [John] > That's the problem with Quality in an academic matrix, and it's not a problem > with Quality, it's a problem with the academic matrix. > > [Arlo] > I think you are conflating Quality with the MOQ. Certainly, one cannot (nor > should try) to constrain "Quality in an academic matrix". > > I think the post I just wrote in the "Philolosophology" thread addresses this, > as you seem to be using the MOQ as a placeholder for the Quality-in-Living > view > as described in ZMM. No one, certainly not me, would say that Quality is > something the academics "can smack their lips on like some bon-bon" (or > something like that). But the MOQ IS an intellectual pattern (again, despite > Bo's mired denial), and as such is about "expanding rationality", which is an > intellectual endeavor, one that is best served by the "academic" discourse of > people like you, Ant, Granger, DMB, Matt, Steve and others. > > ZMM is about planting your garden with care, gumption and Quality. The MOQ is > about an expanded rationality for reinterpreting experience, an intellectual > endeavor. Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
