Ian, Because if you are talking about an individual, I think they must be ever-changing, interdependent, impermanent, inorganic, biological, social and intellectual patterns. Yes? Or did you mean something else?
Marsha On Apr 19, 2010, at 11:32 AM, MarshaV wrote: > > > > Ian, > > What do you mean by 'Eastern Mystic'? > > > Marsha > > > > On Apr 19, 2010, at 4:15 AM, Ian Glendinning wrote: > >> Mary, DMB, Jon, et al >> >> Dave quoted Mary saying ... >> "Much to my own surprise, I find that I am becoming daily more and >> more in the Eastern mysticism camp". >> >> I've been round this loop myself. A traditional rationalist, >> objectivist "engineer" who found the Eastern Mysticism a source of >> embarassment initially - and lets face it there are some whacky >> extremes to be embarrassed about. But once understood how the >> mysticism fits the pragmatism, as Dave says, there is no reason to see >> these as diametrically opposed approaches. (Jon, DMB will explain - >> how long have you got ?) >> >> Mary also said >> "IMHO the MoQ has much greater explanatory power when the Intellectual >> Level is viewed as SOM than when it is not. ..." >> >> I actually agree with this (and I've tried many times to tell Bo I >> agree with him too) so I ask you a question. If we limit the >> intellectual level to this kind of intellect ... where in the >> evolutionary levels of the MoQ does your Eastern Mystic view fit ? >> (Let me guess, everywhere and nowhere at the same time ?) >> >> Ian > > ___ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
