On Apr 20, 2010, at 11:14 AM, Steven Peterson wrote: > On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 10:59 AM, MarshaV <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Hi Steve, >> >> Wow! Can you write! I don't really like your question because >> it's too nebulous. I don't know what you mean by: love, we or >> others? >> >> >> Marsha > > > Hi Marsha, > > I don't like the question either. It's not my question. It is a > question that many believers seem to think is a slam dunk against > atheism but is instead one I think ought to be unasked because of > faulty premises as I tried to explain in the original post. > > As for the undefined terms you asked about, I just use them in the usual > ways... > love: when someone else's well-being is a prerequisite for your own > we: the people who are being asked "why should we love one another?" > other: any being who is not you. > > Best, > Steve
Hi Steve, No disrespect to you, but I find the question not worth answering. I'm sticking with RMP's suggestion that the best way to change society is to work on oneself. Marsha ___ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
