On Apr 20, 2010, at 11:29 AM, MarshaV wrote: > > On Apr 20, 2010, at 11:14 AM, Steven Peterson wrote: > >> On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 10:59 AM, MarshaV <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Steve, >>> >>> Wow! Can you write! I don't really like your question because >>> it's too nebulous. I don't know what you mean by: love, we or >>> others? >>> >>> >>> Marsha >> >> >> Hi Marsha, >> >> I don't like the question either. It's not my question. It is a >> question that many believers seem to think is a slam dunk against >> atheism but is instead one I think ought to be unasked because of >> faulty premises as I tried to explain in the original post. >> >> As for the undefined terms you asked about, I just use them in the usual >> ways... >> love: when someone else's well-being is a prerequisite for your own >> we: the people who are being asked "why should we love one another?" >> other: any being who is not you. >> >> Best, >> Steve > > > > > Hi Steve, > > No disrespect to you, but I find the question not worth answering. I'm > sticking with RMP's suggestion that the best way to change society is > to work on oneself. > > Marsha > > ___ >
Hi Steve, Here is a question I might ask myself: How do I get my head to work side-by-side with my heart? Marsha ___ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
