On 1 Jun 2010 at 5:57, Andre Broersen wrote: Platt to Andre:
Thus, your meaning of subjects and objects in "the MOQ context" is known and believed only by you, me and a handful contributors and lurkers here, to the rest of the world's detriment such as we are witnessing today. Andre: Thanks for your response Platt,and to just clarify, 'objects' in the MOQ context are inorganic and organic patterns of value and 'subjects' are social and intellectual patterns of value, right? Platt Right, according to Pirsig. But, some of questioned this comparison. It imposes S/O standards and values on the MOQ. Andre But this 'known and believed' you are referring to; where has this process taken place? Surely not at the intellectual level since this is SOM...according to SOMe. Platt As described by Pirsig, S/O began to preserve social values and then took off on purposes of its own, becoming the intellectual level (better named the individual level because it because it opposes collectivist values.) Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
