On 6/29/10 1:01 AM, "Ian Glendinning" <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi Ian and all, Iqn, imho your point misses the mark. You are agreeing with Horse¹s assessment that Bo is posting a ³dishonest misrepresentation². The only evidence for that is ³He said, she said². If our opinions are so foreign to logic, then, Horse can say ³Shut UP!² Bo is trying to make the best of a logic that accepts a ³social level² as a level of evolution. I would argue that forever! Should I quake in my boots that I will be asked to leave? Bo has always been respectful in his discussion about what Pirsig meant. Does respect mean he can¹t have a thought of his own? I have found Bo¹s take on the evolution of intellect profound, and if Pirsig and Horse, his representative, do not agree I have no problem with disagreement among friends!. Should we then not think for ourselves when discussing what Pirsig said? Let Bo and Horse fight it out! Joe > And Bo, whilst I defend the fact that you do have valid points, > > I completely agree with Horse when he accuses you of dishonest > misrepresentation in suggesting that your SOLAQI interpretation is > somehow the true interpretation intended by and subsequently agreed > with by Pirsig. That is entirely spurious (and wilfully misleading to > "newcomers") and undermines any value in any points that you do have. > > I have, and Ron recently, engaged in direct dialectical questioning > with you, providing opportunities for direct answers that might lead > somewhere interesting, and at that point you clam up or change the > subject, and repeat your "one true way" claims. > > Dishonesty is exactly why we have a moderator. > Ian Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
