[Craig, previously] > Take Pluto. It was "down-graded" from a planet. If you think that thereby > reality changed, > you see a relationship [between patterns & thinking], if you think it didn't, > you don't.
. [Marsha] > The Pluto pattern doesn't exist without some relationship to > thinking. Does it? . IMHO Pluto's patterns are constituted by its interactions with other patterns. When the platypus was discovered people argued over whether it was a furry reptile, an egg-laying mammal or even possible. But the platypus went on its merry way. So too Pluto's interaction with the sun & other planets is more significant than its interaction with our thinking. Though there must be some| possible interaction, however indirect, between Pluto & us, for Pluto to be real. Craig Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
