More evidence for the MoRaT interpretation where Pirsig justifies cannibalism.
"From a Metaphysics of Quality's point of view this devouring of human bodies is a moral activity" The MoRaT is affirmed again!! ----- Original Message ---- From: X Acto <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Mon, July 19, 2010 9:06:45 AM Subject: [MD] the MoRaT And since it seems we can say anything we want to I want to introduce MoRaT The metaphysics of rape and torture Pirsig clearly supports this in my interpretation that rape and torture are morally superior. " "Now Phaedrus felt it all around him - the speed, the height, the crowds and their tension. All the early strangeness was gone now. He was in it. He remembered that its great symbol used to be the ticker tape, ticking out unpredictable fortunes rising and falling every second, a great symbol of luck. Luck. When E. B. White wrote, 'If you want to live in New York you should be willing to be lucky,' he meant not just 'lucky' but willing to be lucky - that is, Dynamic. If you cling to some set static pattern, when opportunity comes you won't take it. You have to hang loose, and when the time comes to be lucky, then be lucky: that's Dynamic. clearly pirsig means "ass rape" when he uses the term "lucky" but he will not admit it. Pirsig states that we must seize the opportunity to rape and torture at every opportunity. This is the real MoQ The one Pirsig meant it is so obviouse the rest of you morons refuse to discuss the one true MoQ, the MoRaT interpetation. -Ro ----- Original Message ---- From: X Acto <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Mon, July 19, 2010 8:50:26 AM Subject: Re: [MD] inorganic patterns & thinking Since the theory is "nothing is real" test that theory by standing in traffic or jumping off a building. see what happens please ----- Original Message ---- From: Magnus Berg <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Mon, July 19, 2010 7:24:25 AM Subject: Re: [MD] inorganic patterns & thinking On 2010-07-19 11:17, MarshaV wrote: > Sight at its very least is not about identified objects, only form and > color. But one can experience sight sans even form and color too. > It is ALL conceived. It's useful and I wouldn't throw away any but the > arrogance of thinking the "real" has been realized. Arrogance is there in SOM, yes, because in SOM, there's no other relationship between the perceived object in your head and the object observed. But in MoQ, we know that there *is* a direct dependency from our internal image of the object, to the reality of the object via the levels. I'm not saying that your brain is supported by *that* stone, but I'm saying that your brain is supported by inorganic patterns just *like* a stone. So, in SOM, ALL is conceived. But in MoQ, where we have the level dependency and know that our internal "minds" are supported by inorganic patterns, we can know that there are inorganic patterns. From there, I don't think it's arrogant anymore to give the stone a status of real. Magnus Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
