Jeez Marsha, you have successfully changed the thread. I was supporting a statement of Bo's and asking what words he would use. End of.
If you want to argue as to whether posts contain "just" words - please start another thread ... you yourself detected "violence" in the posts - in your own words. If you want to comment about "some people's" behaviour in general, please stop addressing them to me ... or I may take offence ;-) Ian On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 11:46 AM, MarshaV <[email protected]> wrote: > > Ian, > > Develop meditation first, and then your questions will change, and you > may understand the answers differently. I do not get the violence, by some, > towards Bo. It represents such disharmony, whether he is understood or > not. After all these posts ARE comprised of "just" words. I think nobody on > this list gets that these are just bits and pieces of pattern, and not swords > and rocks. > > > Marsha > > > > > > On Jul 21, 2010, at 6:17 AM, Ian Glendinning wrote: > >> Yes, Marsha, I understand you - I can see problems with the words (all >> words in fact) I use zillions of scare quotes etc ... >> >> But having meditated what word do you suggest I /we use in the next >> email or are we to meditate INSTEAD OF communicate in words. >> >> Ian >> >> On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 8:59 AM, MarshaV <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> On Jul 21, 2010, at 3:53 AM, Ian Glendinning wrote: >>> >>>> Just using the accepted word - "manipulation of symbols" - Marsha >>> >>> whatever... >>> >>> >>>> >>>> The point of the question (to Boristotlists or SIMians) is say it in your >>>> words. >>>> What these subjects and objects are .... words in sentences ? >>> >>> Self and objects are a case of mistaken identity. >>> >>> >>>> variables in equations ? representing concepts ? If you don't like the >>>> language - stop complaining and make a positive suggestion. >>> >>> The word 'held' also presumes someone to hold subjects and objects. >>> Really, you should try meditation and see for yourself. >>> >>> >>> Marsha >>> >>> >>>> Ian >>>> >>>> On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 8:28 AM, MarshaV <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> On Jul 21, 2010, at 2:39 AM, Ian Glendinning wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> In your words - without resorting to the word mind - how are these >>>>>> subjects and objects held, manipulated, in intellect ? >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Hi Ian, >>>>> >>>>> Seems that your question assumes a manipulator. Maybe an intellect >>>>> can be considered a collection of favored intellectual patterns? Favored >>>>> by an individual or community. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Marsha >>>>> >>>>> ___ >>>>> >>>>> > > > > ___ > > > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org/md/archives.html > Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
