On Jul 21, 2010, at 7:02 AM, Ian Glendinning wrote: > Jeez Marsha, you have successfully changed the thread.
Right! Your "(to Boristotlists or SIMians)" was just a bit of kindness and understanding. whatever... Marsha > > I was supporting a statement of Bo's and asking what words he would use. End > of. > > If you want to argue as to whether posts contain "just" words - please > start another thread ... you yourself detected "violence" in the posts > - in your own words. If you want to comment about "some people's" > behaviour in general, please stop addressing them to me ... or I may > take offence ;-) > > Ian > > On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 11:46 AM, MarshaV <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Ian, >> >> Develop meditation first, and then your questions will change, and you >> may understand the answers differently. I do not get the violence, by some, >> towards Bo. It represents such disharmony, whether he is understood or >> not. After all these posts ARE comprised of "just" words. I think nobody on >> this list gets that these are just bits and pieces of pattern, and not swords >> and rocks. >> >> >> Marsha >> >> >> >> >> >> On Jul 21, 2010, at 6:17 AM, Ian Glendinning wrote: >> >>> Yes, Marsha, I understand you - I can see problems with the words (all >>> words in fact) I use zillions of scare quotes etc ... >>> >>> But having meditated what word do you suggest I /we use in the next >>> email or are we to meditate INSTEAD OF communicate in words. >>> >>> Ian >>> >>> On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 8:59 AM, MarshaV <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> On Jul 21, 2010, at 3:53 AM, Ian Glendinning wrote: >>>> >>>>> Just using the accepted word - "manipulation of symbols" - Marsha >>>> >>>> whatever... >>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>> The point of the question V is say it in your words. >>>>> What these subjects and objects are .... words in sentences ? >>>> >>>> Self and objects are a case of mistaken identity. >>>> >>>> >>>>> variables in equations ? representing concepts ? If you don't like the >>>>> language - stop complaining and make a positive suggestion. >>>> >>>> The word 'held' also presumes someone to hold subjects and objects. >>>> Really, you should try meditation and see for yourself. >>>> >>>> >>>> Marsha >>>> >>>> >>>>> Ian >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 8:28 AM, MarshaV <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> On Jul 21, 2010, at 2:39 AM, Ian Glendinning wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> In your words - without resorting to the word mind - how are these >>>>>>> subjects and objects held, manipulated, in intellect ? >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi Ian, >>>>>> >>>>>> Seems that your question assumes a manipulator. Maybe an intellect >>>>>> can be considered a collection of favored intellectual patterns? Favored >>>>>> by an individual or community. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Marsha >>>>>> >>>>>> ___ >>>>>> >>>>>> >> >> >> >> ___ >> >> >> Moq_Discuss mailing list >> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. >> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org >> Archives: >> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ >> http://moq.org/md/archives.html >> > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org/md/archives.html ___ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
