[Platt] I think (subject), therefore I am (objective state of being). Get it? The real mystery is how you think I equated a supernatural theistic world view with SOM.
[Krimel] I think (subject), therefore I am (subjective state of being). Get it there is not objective there are at all. Descartes moves on from here to derive objectives but at this point it is just solipsism. [Platt] So existence is subjective? I didn't know you were an idealist. [Krimel] This was Descartes idea not mine. [Platt] A supernatural theistic world view is just as SOM as all world views except those of mystics who reject all bisected world views and artists who never know beforehand exactly what their world view will become. Other than those two groups, I have yet to see anybody designate a culture not dominated by SOM, and back it up with credible source. [Krimel] I suspect this is because you begin your inquires with conclusions and try to find reasons why your conclusions must be correct. I regard this as a form of dishonest inquiry of the sort practiced by dmb, Origin, and people like Josh McDowell. [Krimel] In information theory the world is composed of information not subjects or objects. In fractal geometry the world is not composed of discrete static units of space and/or time but is continuous and dynamic. It is deterministic but not predicatable. [Platt] I guess you're saying mathematics is a "world beyond SOM." If so, you're not alone. Some scientists like Roger Penrose also a takes a Platonic viewpoint. l preferin-the-sky the here-and -now variety of reality rather than the pie-in- the-sky variety. I respect Plato's assumption of a world of perfect forms of which we are merely a poor SOM reflection. But when I think of mathematics and mathematical theories, I think of subjects manipulating objective symbols in a structured manner. [Krimel] No I am saying that in a variety of forms of human inquiry, SOM is not the underlying metaphysics. [Krimel] Without a government the private sector wouldn't have any money or infrastructure to conduct its business. By isolating the legal use of force to government we avoid having it used willy nilly in acts of barbarism. [Platt] I certainly agree government has legitimate functions. You mentioned several important ones. Our differences are about size, scope and overall purpose. [Krimel] I might even be willing to acknowledge that the federal government has taken on a bigger role than it ought to have. But I think you should be willing to acknowledge that the federal government was forced into this position by negligence at the state and local level. [Krimel] You constantly remind us of the body counts racked up by Pol Pot, Stalin, Hitler and whoever else comes to mind and you have defended our genocide of native tribes and the murder and abuse of slaves on the basis of us having killed fewer of them. [Platt] I don't think my "reminders" have been constant of the millions murdered by socialist governments, although it's good to be reminded from time to time how the best of intentions can go horribly wrong. If I left you with the impression that I think Indian genocide or murder and abuse of slaves was excusable, I categorically deny that I think that. What I do point out is that we ended slavery and Indian genocide Indians in the 19th century while countries in Europe and Asia, supposedly more "civilized" than "unsophisticated" America, proceeded on a course of horror, death and destruction beyond anything previously endured by any peoples in history. Then you have to ask why. [Krimel] So now you run away from your emphasis on body count and claim the moral superiority of timing. The point remains that there are 5 billion more people alive and flourishing as a direct result of technology. Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
