Hi
[Platt]
I think (subject), therefore I am (objective state of being). Get it? The
real mystery is how you think I equated a supernatural theistic world view
with
SOM.
[Krimel]
I think (subject), therefore I am (subjective state of being). Get it there
is not objective there are at all. Descartes moves on from here to derive
objectives but at this point it is just solipsism.
Just had to chime in here. The MoQ's stance here is actually:
I think (I (subject), experience the ideas (object) in my brain)
therefore I exist in the same stack in which my physical brain resides.
Because ideas are intellectual patterns and all patterns are dependent
on lower level patterns.
Magnus
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html
