a concept inflated within a concept to deploy a redefinition of the conceptual, this will not stay Moqrehensible.
2010/8/2 Arlo Bensinger <[email protected]> > [Mary] > The levels are not 'concepts'. > > [Arlo] > If we use the MOQ to examine the MOQ, what kind of patterns are the MOQ > "levels"? > > For example, we say the "inorganic level" consists of "inorganic patterns > of value", but is what we call the "inorganic level" also an "inorganic > pattern of value"? > > Nearly all of us would say no, right? > > So is the "inorganic level" an "intellectual pattern of value"? If not, > what IS it? > > If it is not an inorganic or biological or social or intellectual pattern > of value, what is it? > > Bo has proposed a 'expansion of reality', and from his posts I gather you > all see the answer being that the "levels" are "MOQ patterns of value", a > new level of patterns sitting above the intellectual level". > > Is this right or wrong, and if wrong, what type of pattern is "the > inorganic level", or any/all of the "levels"? > > > > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org/md/archives.html > -- parser Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
