For Krimel 2 Aug. :
[Mary] had said: > The problem is not with the word 'static'. The problem is with the > word 'concepts'. The levels are not 'concepts'. [Krimel] > All words are concepts. Seriously, until you get this, you are just > pissing in the wind. Mary, does not deny the fact that words are concepts, she just says that the levels aren't concepts. I.e. that DMB's Jamesian "Dynamic Flux/Concepts" doesn't correspond to MOQ's "Dynamic/Static". Language is the sea we swim in and cannot be used as any metaphysical basics. The same goes for "human beings". We can postulate a time before language and a time before Homo Sapiens, but not as a basic divide like DMB's "Everything not language/Language" or SOM's "Everything not subjective/Subjective". All such ends in paradoxes: All is conveyed by language, the objective is contained in the subject. FYI Bodvar Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
