On Aug 9, 2010, at 3:09 PM, Matt Kundert wrote: > >>> Marsha has her thesis down to two pithy statements. >>> That's a great first step. I wish she didn't see it as the only step she >>> needs, but I am urging something like that precision of response: a >>> Pirsigian catachism of Quality. >> >> Matt, >> >> The two statements I made to Arlo were my response to his questions, >> they represented my understanding of the MoQ, not a thesis and not a >> Pirsigian catechism of Quality. That you might perceive this to be 'only >> a step' towards some other needed goal I wish you would explain. Do I >> need a goal? Why? What should that goal be? > > For me the MoQ represents, denotes, signifies, Reality = Quality(unpatterned > experience/patterned experience).
Sorry Matt, it seemed from YOUR statement you thought there should be more. ___ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
