Mary. On 9 Aug. Mary wrote to Arlo: :
> No, we don't agree here. This conversation is not possible. To > answer you in an Intellectual Level context, they are Intellectual > concepts. It's the context that is flawed. It would be the same if > we were discussing particle physics. If one of us was a priest trying > to fit particle physics into a religious framework and the other was > trying to talk about it as understood scientifically, what basis for > conversation would we have? Would any real understanding be possible? Bo's superfluous comment: This is it all in a nutshell. We see things from the MOQ while Arlo's p.o.v is the intellectual level - must be because in his view the MOQ is an intellectual pattern - and from intellect seen the term "intellect" is a mindish realm where descriptions of reality are, while MOQ's 4th. level is SOM, i.e. the value of - among countless S/Os - the description/reality one. [Mary again to Arlo] > I have a question for you now. How does equating Quality, Values, and > Morals with Intellectual concepts progress an understanding of the > MOQ? If, as you say, the levels of Quality are Intellectual concepts, > how does this clarify what is meant by a pattern of values? What > makes this different from a subject-object understanding? Spot, on but Arlo no doubt will return with the MOQ - its levels and all - as intellectual concepts different from Quality ...etc. We'll see. Bodvar Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
