On Aug 9, 2010, at 4:00 PM, Matt Kundert wrote: > >>>>> Marsha has her thesis down to two pithy statements. >>>>> That's a great first step. I wish she didn't see it as the only step she >>>>> needs, but I am urging something like that precision of response: a >>>>> Pirsigian catachism of Quality. >>>> >>>> Matt, >>>> >>>> The two statements I made to Arlo were my response to his questions, >>>> they represented my understanding of the MoQ, not a thesis and not a >>>> Pirsigian catechism of Quality. That you might perceive this to be 'only >>>> a step' towards some other needed goal I wish you would explain. Do I >>>> need a goal? Why? What should that goal be? >>> >>> For me the MoQ represents, denotes, signifies, Reality = >>> Quality(unpatterned experience/patterned experience). >> >> Sorry Matt, it seemed from YOUR statement you thought there should be more. > > Once the defining and analysis of the MoQ has started, it has dropped into > the Intellectual Level where it represents ZMM, LILA, Lila's Child, and all > interviews, letters, papers and discussions used to divide, define and know > it.
Very true, Matt, very true... - Marsha ___ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
