On Aug 22, 2010, at 5:05 AM, Magnus Berg wrote: > >>> Agreement! Thanks for not pulling out the SOM rabbit as many others do. >>> Respect. >> >> Marsha: >> SOM is a major issue within RMP's rhetoric; why should you want >> to avoid it? Its subject/object orientation is in direct opposition to the >> MoQ's value orientation. What could possibly be your objection? >> That it is too difficult to confront? That it is too difficult to resolve? > > I would want to avoid it when it's not relevant, like in this case where > Craig spotted a difference of opinion where SOM was not an issue, but many > others just use it as the "usual suspect". > > Magnus >
Marsha: Patterns existing "outside our concepts of them" seems to make it a SOM issue, but I could be wrong. Do patterns exist as independent entities? ___ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
