On Aug 22, 2010, at 3:07 PM, David Thomas wrote: > On 8/22/10 1:14 PM, "MarshaV" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> [Marsha] >> The 'self' hasn't even been mentioned in this post, so what is this response? >> A projection, or diversion? > >>> [Marsha] >>> seems to make it a SOM issue, > > [Dave] > SOM > Subject-Object Metaphysics > Self-Other Metaphysics > > See the connection? You started with it.
Marsha: Your fictitious 'to the effect' Dalai Lama quote did not directly confront SOM, it was a low-level diversion to disarm my statement, and avoid the next question in the original post: >>> >>> Marsha to Magnus: >>> Patterns existing "outside our concepts of them" seems to >>> make it a SOM issue,but I could be wrong. Do patterns >>> exist as independent entities? Marsha >>> [Dave before] >>> the MoQ is perfectly compatible with scientific realism. > >> [Marsha] >> As long as you remember it's just an idea. > >>> [Marsha before] >>> I fix eggs, chop wood and carry water. > >> [Marsha again] >> As long as you remember it's just an idea. > > Dave ___ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
