Adrie
"ADRIE KINTZIGER" <[email protected]> wrote:
>hi guys, Magnus , Krimel,
>
>Gravity was always present in the universe , it only became existing by
>observing it , the set was complete.
>
>differentiation; differentiate existence from ,....was present before
>existence.
>Pirsig himself is pointing out towards this line of thinking in an interview
>somewhere, when he is asked the question
>did'n gravity exist before Newton? wat was the apple doing then before
>Newton,; Pirsig answers , "it just felt"
>IMPLICATING that gravity was present before Newton, before it was
>formulated.
>It was just there, outside of recognizible existence.
But that's exactly what I'm saying when I say that the inorganic pattern
"gravity" was present before Newton formulated the intellectual pattern "theory
of gravity". The only difference is that I use terms defined by the MoQ, and
isn't that what we should be doing here?
Magnus
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html
