Yes , sorry Magnus , i did some re-reading and you are wright, correct , i can see now , it was however your end-sentence that made me doubting your optics. But it is fine-tuned now.
This was the sentence making me doubt quote magnus. [Magnus] Does it still exist outside of our concepts of it? Or did it seize to exist when we conceptualized it?-------see it?,..this was rather slippery. 2010/8/25 Magnus Berg <[email protected]> > > Adrie > > "ADRIE KINTZIGER" <[email protected]> wrote: > > >hi guys, Magnus , Krimel, > > > >Gravity was always present in the universe , it only became existing by > >observing it , the set was complete. > > > >differentiation; differentiate existence from ,....was present before > >existence. > >Pirsig himself is pointing out towards this line of thinking in an > interview > >somewhere, when he is asked the question > >did'n gravity exist before Newton? wat was the apple doing then before > >Newton,; Pirsig answers , "it just felt" > >IMPLICATING that gravity was present before Newton, before it was > >formulated. > >It was just there, outside of recognizible existence. > > But that's exactly what I'm saying when I say that the inorganic pattern > "gravity" was present before Newton formulated the intellectual pattern > "theory of gravity". The only difference is that I use terms defined by the > MoQ, and isn't that what we should be doing here? > > Magnus > > > > > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org/md/archives.html > -- parser Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
