Hi Magnus, well, at this level i think any system is as valuable as dark matter or dark energy,your proposal is as good as the dark matter model. as long as they are not violating previous proof, and are not conflicting with other proven laws of nature. so your proposal is as good as the models scientists are promoting. there is no reason to abandon the path you promote,but you have to take all previous knowlegde in concideration. Think of this example for a minut, Laws of nature)) action=reaction, push pull, this is also valid for gravity, action= reaction.
Now think of this, The push-pull model,intrinsically is based upon a waveoscillating pattern, not only the waves are oscillating but also the objects affected by this proces, matter is perceiving a wave-impuls in an oscillating patter. The uncertainty-principle will affect matter as well, in this model, this was in fact the last question coming from Einstein before his death, the wavecaracter of matter. It is not observed yet. personally i have no knowledge about dark matter or dark energy, it is of course possible to dig into the matter , so to speak. But your proposed model is equal as good. Think i will come back on the freatic surface later on this evening , it matters,we stepped over it , it shows how gravity can represent itself, a good view on its behaviour.more this evening. Greetzz, Adrie 2010/9/3 Magnus Berg <[email protected]> > On 2010-09-03 22:08, ADRIE KINTZIGER wrote: > >> The current view is that it is the empty space between stars and planets >> that is accelerating, not the galaxy's themselves >> the empty space is expanding. >> > > Yes, so there must be something within that empty space that is able to > push space and galaxies apart, right? > > The question is, is it more logical to invent some new patch like dark > energy that nobody knows what it is? Or, explain it using a push-gravity > model that more or less does what dark energy is supposed to do, plus does > what what the current model of gravity does? > > > Magnus > > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org/md/archives.html > -- parser Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
