Magnus, My wondering is much like yours, in that the current models of understanding were somehow missing the picture - stuck in a wrong mindset. Maybe the ancients weren't so far off just dubbing it all aetherially! And yeah, I made that word up, but you get the point.
Our one conclusion is that the relationship of space and gravity needs revision. Gravity and Space functions of one thing, rather than an intersection of two independent entities reacting to the other. Your speculation about space "pushing" and matter interfering, rather than matter sucking, and space passively observing, seems a very likely and interesting hypothesis. How do you test it? On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 1:16 PM, Magnus Berg <[email protected]> wrote: > On 2010-09-03 22:08, ADRIE KINTZIGER wrote: > >> The current view is that it is the empty space between stars and planets >> that is accelerating, not the galaxy's themselves >> the empty space is expanding. >> > > Yes, so there must be something within that empty space that is able to > push space and galaxies apart, right? > > The question is, is it more logical to invent some new patch like dark > energy that nobody knows what it is? Or, explain it using a push-gravity > model that more or less does what dark energy is supposed to do, plus does > what what the current model of gravity does? > > I'm not sure I understand what you mean by what dark energy is supposed to do. How exactly do they relate? If you don't mind my asking. John the curious > > Magnus > > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org/md/archives.html > Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
