Why would you thank me? If I had any influence on your revision this definition
would make a lot more sense to me. As I see it, you have defined the
intellectual level so that Pirsig's solution is thrown out the window and the
problem is re-established. You've confused the disease for the cure, thereby
construing the MOQ as an anti-intellectual form of the metaphysics it opposes.
It's hard to imagine how a person could be more mistaken.
>
> Thanks to dmb I have slightly revised my definition:
>
> Intellectual Static Patterns of Value are reified concepts and the rules
> for their rational analysis and manipulation. Intellectual patterns process
> from a subject/object conceptual framework creating false boundaries
> that give the illusion of independence as a “thing” or as an “object of
> analysis.” The fourth level is a formalized subject/object level (SOM),
> where the paramount demand is for rational, objective knowledge,
> which is free from the taint of any subjectivity.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Marsha
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html
