Adrie,
I've posted a lot of stuff. Consider it or don't. Maybe the book will arrive today, and I will have more to post. By the way, are you a physicist? And why you exalt what you point out? I don't. Marsha On Sep 18, 2010, at 11:13 AM, ADRIE KINTZIGER wrote: > But you forgot the rest of the article Marsha > > I isolated a part from the article further on as i am very good in Nonlocal > &local reality's. > > comment on isolated part > > Their treatment of two-slit interference ranks right up there with (but > differs interestingly from) Feynman’s famous “comes in lumps” approach, and > their nontechnical description of Bell’s theorem is one of the best I’ve > seen, and by far the least mathematical. > > > 3 problems > trying to ridicule Feynman is not a very good idea, this is adressed at the > autor. > > The Bell theorem. > The theorem is specifically rejected by most of the scientifical > world,because its a limp home formula. > it is under controverse since it was stated.Its rubbish. > > MR PIRSIG, specifically rejects the theoreme, in one of his annotations on > LILA'S CHILD,in a earlier stage of history. > He recognised very early that it was crap, and i happen to agree with him > and 99% of science. > PIRSIG rejects it for a reason, this is very easy to find back. > > > Nb, i was already pointing out in a conversation with Mr Buchanan, some time > ago, that PIRSIG rejects the theoreme > It is still to be found back in the archives, or in the annotations > made upon LILA. > > > this is only 1 leech to kill, there are more in the article... > sincerely yours , Pontius PILATUS, landlord of judea, the man on the > mountain. > > > > > 2010/9/18 MarshaV <[email protected]> > >> >> >> from American Journal of Physics Review of Quantum Enigma: >> >> >> Take space-time, for example. We organize our perceptions into events, and >> for many purposes it is illuminating to represent those events as points in >> an abstract four-dimensional continuum. This is so useful that most of us >> reify this abstract scheme, believing that we inhabit a world that is such a >> four- (or, for a few of us, ten-) dimensional continuum. The reification of >> abstract time and space goes so far back in human history that it’s easy to >> miss the intellectual sleight of hand. The reification of electric and >> magnetic fields is more recent but also came to be taken for granted, until >> it started to unravel (for some of us) with the arrival of quantum >> electrodynamics. The strongest hints of how we have been fooling ourselves >> emerge when we try to reify quantum states, and thereby run into “the >> measurement problem” and “quantum nonlocality.” >> >> >> http://quantumenigma.com/reviews-our-responses/ >> >> ___ >> >> >> Moq_Discuss mailing list >> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. >> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org >> Archives: >> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ >> http://moq.org/md/archives.html >> > > > > -- > parser > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org/md/archives.html ___ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
