dmb,

The misinterpretation was totally my fault, not your fault.  I am sorry.  


Marsha








On Sep 28, 2010, at 3:59 PM, david buchanan wrote:

> 
> 
> Marsha, Marsha, Marsha:
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Hmmm. The warmth and sincerity of your apology is overwhelming. Excuse me 
> while a grab a hanky. 
> 
> Look, it hardly matters what you were excited about or even if you were 
> excited at all. Either way, "excited" was your word, I wasn't making anything 
> up, and "excited" hardly constitutes an accusation that you should want to 
> defend anyway.
> 
> Regardless of whether or not you found it exciting, posting the quote 
> demonstrates some level of interest in it. So I offered an explanation of the 
> hypothetical scientist described in the quote as she relates to the hard 
> problem of consciousness. 
> 
> And what was your response? You focused on the least relevant part and then 
> used that to make a conspicuously false accusation. Was anything of substance 
> added beyond this irrelevance and falsity? Nope. Zip, zero, nada. 
> 
> Some people would have responded by saying thanks and/or by saying something 
> about the hard problem of consciousness or the hypothetical black&white lady 
> scientist. But not Marsha. No way. That would be way too reasonable and fair. 
> Marsha don't roll that way, huh?
> 
> 
> 
>> From: [email protected]
>> Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 15:14:22 -0400
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: Re: [MD] Quantum Enigma
>> 
>> 
>> As I previously posted an apology to you dmb.  I'll paste it in...   
>> 
>> 
>> On Sep 28, 2010, at 2:55 PM, MarshaV wrote:
>> 
>>> 
>>> dmb,
>>> 
>>> The excitement is for the quantum enigma:  the apparent creation of reality 
>>> by conscious observation.  I'd never heard it discussed so openly by 
>>> physicists in such a well-reviewed book.  But I can see where the colon 
>>> might have led you astray.  Sorry.   
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Marsha 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Sep 28, 2010, at 3:05 PM, david buchanan wrote:
>> 
>>> 
>>> Marsha:
>>> Didn't mention at all being excited about quote.  You are making baloney 
>>> again, dmb.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> dmb says:
>>> 
>>> Making up baloney? Well, it's possible that someone other than you prefaced 
>>> the quote by saying, "Everybody in the world may know this but moi, but I 
>>> find it terribly exciting" but I didn't make it up. Once again, your memory 
>>> lapse becomes my sinister deception. Check the archives and then maybe you 
>>> should see your doctor about the health status of your short-term memory.
>>> 
>>> But I'm pretty sure you're just bending over backwards to be against 
>>> whatever I say, no matter what - even when it was you who said it. 
>>> 
>>> As they say about Obama and the Republicans, If I came out in favor of air 
>>> you'd stop breathing. 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>>                                       
>>> Moq_Discuss mailing list
>>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>>> Archives:
>>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>>> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ___
>> 
>> 
>> Moq_Discuss mailing list
>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>> Archives:
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>                                         
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html


 
___
 

Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html

Reply via email to