On Oct 19, 2010, at 12:48 PM, 118 wrote: > On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 7:29 AM, MarshaV <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Oct 19, 2010, at 10:23 AM, Dan Glover wrote: >> >>> Hello everyone >>> >>> On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 4:26 AM, MarshaV <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> On Oct 18, 2010, at 11:39 PM, Dan Glover wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> Dan: >>>>> >>>>> The intellectual level is just thinking, plain and simple. You know >> that, John. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Marsha: >>>> Aren't all patterns conceptually constructed? Wouldn't that make all >> levels "just thinking?" >>> >>> Hi Marsha >>> >>> I would say that within the framework of the MOQ, inorganic and >>> biological patterns are physical. We can touch them, examine them. >>> Social and intellectual patterns are mental... like the President of >>> the United States. There is no way to physically tell the President >>> apart from any other human being by examination. So to answer your >>> question, no, not all levels are "just thinking." In addition, there >>> seem to social patterns of value that are not intellectual, like >>> saying "Bless you" when someone sneezes. Those types of patterns are >>> ingrained in us to the extent that we really don't think about it. >>> >>> Dan >>> >> >> >> >> Dan, >> >> If I think "Should I say "Bless you." to this guy." does that make it an >> intellectual static pattern of value or a social static pattern of value? >> >> >> Marsha >> > > Mark: > Yes.
Marsha: And the notion that the Intellectual Level represent theology, science, philosophy and mathematics has collapsed into thinking about whether to say "Bless you.", or not? No, I don't buy that. ___ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
