Andre,
Your reference is, of course, to ZMM which doesn't not present a metaphysics, static patterns of value, Intellectual or otherwise, or a hierarchical, evolutionary structure. Marsha On Oct 25, 2010, at 3:35 AM, Andre Broersen wrote: > Platt to Mark: > > In the Metaphysics of Quality, the source of concepts such as SOM is > Dynamic Quality. DQ is the source of all things. > > Andre: > I stand corrected here Platt but this does not seem quite right. Yes, as > Phaedrus puts it in ZMM > 'The Quality event is the cause of the subjects and the objects,...' but this > does not yet make for a > [subject-object] metaphysics. SOM emerged out of the observation with which > Phaedrus concludes the sentence:'... which are then mistakenly presumed to be > the cause of Quality!'. (ZMM, p234) > > SOM does not acknowledge DQ. It suggests that the basic stuff 'composing' > reality are subjects and objects full stop...and that Quality is an attribute > of subjects and objects. This is backwards. > > 'The dilemma all the time had this unseen vile presumption in it, for which > there was no logical justification, that Quality was the effect of subjects > and objects. It was not!He brought out his knife. > 'The sun of Quality' he wrote 'does not revolve around the subjects and > objects of our existence. It does not passively illuminate them. It is not > subordinate to them in any way.It has created them. They are subordinate to > it'(ibid) > > > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org/md/archives.html ___ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
