On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 11:29 AM, Andre Broersen <[email protected]>wrote:
> Mark to Andre: > > Sorry if my command of grammar is not up to snuff. I wouldn't get into a > grammar debate if I were you. Yes, it did just come up, you brought it up. > I was discussing it, you do not have to discuss it if you care not to, I > understand. So, how is flux stable? > > Andre: > Nothing wrong with your grammar Mark. The 'flux' I meant to designate is > better understood as 'vibrating'. If it is fixed it cannot change. Stability > does not mean 'fixed'. It means stably vibrating...until something better > comes along. > [Mark] Yea, I like vibrating. It can created harmonics like the levels, I agree with that. String theory is useful, but there are way too many dimensions for me. Seems a bit suspect. > > Mark: > Good quote, perhaps the grammar is not very leading there... Yes, > Qualityis THE event if you want to put it that way. The term event has many > philosophical synonyms. My opinion is that you are not using it in the > right way. I would prefer the term wedstrijd to gebeurtenis. > > Andre: > A very good observation, and I have thought long and hard to describe the > 'event' and concluded that the Dutch rendition of the word 'event' in the > way that the MOQ requires it is not 'gebeurtenis' but 'beleving'. This seems > to me more direct and a truer representation. (You may disagree) > [Mark] Believing is good, I prefer playing like in the vedic lila. > > Mark: > How would you define patterns of value? Just asking so that I can converse > with you. > > Andre: > Well, I thought we are already conversing so there must be some value > recognized (without wanting to be a smart-arse) > Patterns of value are what they point to: abstractions of Quality based on > valuations, on what is best, on what 'feels' right, on what can help us > improve, on what is beauty, on what brings us closer into harmony with all, > on what is desperately crying out for recognition. > > They are valuations, and not just personal ones (otherwise they would not > be included...for the time being...). These are valuations shared by all of > us. As much 'inner' as 'outer' making up our cultural heritage and universal > origins. > [Mark] OK, this gives me a basis to go on. I'll try to get this old brain into gear. Best, Mark > > > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org/md/archives.html > Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
