Hi Andrie, Would you call questioning the premises of science irrational? Sounds to me like a rational inquiry. Who makes the rules on what is rational? How would you describe spiritual rationality? If attacking rationality rationally is a problem, then how should it be done? Where does the root lie? Please identify it so that we can converse on common ground.
Some questions for you. And, please stay coherent. Cheers Mark [Andrie before] Hi , Dave, yes , these words are wisely chosen. Implausible,incoherent and dishonest. The guy is a fraude.It is impossible to make progress by criminalising progress itself. If you like to compare the used demagogy with some demagogy here, the root of rationality comes to mind, on the question to expand the 'root' of rationality The answer is to attack rationality itself, deviating the possible answers to a field that stays away from the root of rationality. Theresienstadt-arguments really. good reflections , Thanks, Adrie Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
