Hi Platt,

I will use your last statement below to amplify.  Not because of its
combative nature, but because of what it points to as a result of the
conversation previously from you (in my interpretation).

[Platt]
Why don't you simply say: Platt is a conservative and supports free market
capitalism, so I will do whatever I can to slime him. Not what one expects
when trying to reach mutual understanding.

[Mark]
Free market support points to individual freedom.  For this reason, I
believe your answer to X's question and the subject matter would be that you
value the individual (or biological level) as having the highest quality.
 One doesn't have to choose of course, and the question is simply an
effector itself (let's call it the X factor).  In this interpretation of
your responses, I would have to agree with you.  The individual is not
subordinate to society or intellect as MoQ suggests with the hierarchy.
 This would be similar to the trunk of a plant not being subordinate to the
forest and flowers on one side, and the roots on the other.  It comprises
the individual component, and shines from its own merit.

Placing people into boxes makes discussion easier, but often results in one
battling his own ghosts.  As such, such discussion is not directed towards
you but towards a personal phantom.  There is no defense against that, and
none needed.

Mark
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html

Reply via email to