Tim said:
About murder I would just add, dmb, that it was my point that the argument in
support of the murder I highlighted was an intelligent argument. If might not
be very intelligent, but it was in the level of intelligence none-the-less? My
point is, how is intelligence judged? What makes intelligence intelligence?
How can one assign any qualitative (or quantitative) distinction to any
intelligent proposition? Perhaps we need a new word, but I have been recycling
'objective'.
dmb says:
I'm not even making a philosophical point here, Tim. I'm just talking about
human decency and common sense. If you're smart enough to understand the word
"murder" then you should realize how crazy you sound. An intelligent argument
in favor of child murder? There are animals that wouldn't stoop that low. You
really don't see what a monstrously evil idea that is? How could such a thing
ever be considered "intelligent" or "intellectual"?
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html
