Ian, Ian, Ian, I did not realize how much I have missed you. Let me count the ways.
one. It's not just looseing rigid logic to fuzzy logic, it's logic itself > that is at fault, when we are asking why, what value ? > > two. > Clearly Pirsigian (and Deweyan, and Jamesian, and Maxwellian, and > Hofstaderian, and .... many other) academics make a little headway > here and there, but the collective is in the Giant's grip. three. > it's Maxwell's neurosis of > scientism. A preposterous arrogance that by building logically on what > we already "know" we make progress - Doh! 9th floor, so far so good. > > four. > That's not a reason to give up the fight against the Giant, but a > reason to stop arguing using the Giant's preferred meme, playing into > the Giant's hands and merely re-inforcing the problem. (I wish I had > time to write that essay ....) > > (me too) five. > Scientists discover new life ?!?! WTF .... gimme strength. (and no > dmb, like Wittgenstein, I do not expect you to understand, but I still > love you, man.) > > six (blush) > Bring on the poets, Dan, John ... (Matt dare I say) > Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
