Hi Marsha,
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 11:55 AM, MarshaV <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Dec 7, 2010, at 2:34 PM, 118 wrote: > >> Hi Marsha, >> Can you appreciate the sun on your face without thinking there is sun >> on your face? I think you can. You find it pleasing in an >> intellectual way without any subject object. > > In a experiential way. I don't need intellectual static patterns of value > to enjoy the sun on my face. [Mark] OK, then we have a different appreciation for the intellectual level. I am fine with that. What I am saying is that the intellect is not only static patterns of value, it is dynamic. I think this is what I stated earlier, but I now restate it. If your definition of intellect is the static pattern of value, then I see how you agree with Bo. It is just another way of looking at it. > > >> If you want to place >> this in another level, then you are not using your brain for such a >> thing which seems hard to imagine (literally of course, you are always >> using your brain in these posts). > > What? Are you one of those who reduces all conceptual experiences > to brain activity? [Mark] No, but the reflective appreciation would seem to be. It would seem that concepts are a brain thing, but maybe not. I suppose the foot can have concepts too, and so can a planet. I was trying to stick within a more defined framework. > > > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org/md/archives.html > Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
