On Dec 8, 2010, at 12:45 PM, Arlo Bensinger wrote:

> [Marsha]
> You reframed the issue from intellectual static patterns of value to concepts.
> 
> [Arlo]
> Which points back to my question, are there "concepts" that are NOT 
> "intellectual static patterns"? Or, are there "intellectual static patterns" 
> that are not "concepts"?
> 
> Clearly you do not think the terms are the same. All I am asking for is 
> clarity.
> 
> For the record, I didn't "reframe" anything.
> 
> You first used the expression "reified concepts", to which I asked if there 
> was such a thing as "unreified concepts".
> 
> You responded, "Not "unreified' intellectual static (concepts) patterns of 
> value."
> 
> So it was YOU who moved "reframed" this from "concepts" into "intellectual 
> static patterns of value", and are now accusing me of "reframing" it back to 
> "concepts". Ai yi yi.
> 

Arlo,

I'm sorry, but I see nowhere for this discussion to proceed.  Thanks for your 
time.   


Marsha  


 
___
 

Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html

Reply via email to