----- Original Message ----
From: Horse <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Mon, December 13, 2010 1:38:23 PM
Subject: Re: [MD] Thus spoke Lila

Hi Platt

This worries me in that a simple phrase/verb such as "to know" should cause a 
problem in relation to what you have called the 'real' world of mystic reality. 
It makes me think that what you have said has no bearing on what you believe, 
in 
the sense that mystic reality is devoid of concepts and knowing is the creation 
of concepts.
Knowledge of, knowledge about or knowledge that etc. X refers to something that 
can be known. The whole point of DQ/Mysticism in the MoQ sense is that it can 
only be experienced and not known.
Or perhaps I've got it wrong. Anyone else agree or disagree?

Horse

Horse,
I agree. The most general concept in referance to it is the good. I think the 
reason we seek
the mystic is for the overwhelming feeling of the good as an emotion as an 
experience. 

Is associating this experience with the experience of the sound of the human 
voice uttering
the words "the good" suggesting a conceptual understanding? 

or is this the point where they become two aspects of one experience.


      
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html

Reply via email to