Horse and Platt, In catching up on past dialogue, this caught my attention:
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 10:38 AM, Horse <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Platt > > This worries me in that a simple phrase/verb such as "to know" should cause > a problem in relation to what you have called the 'real' world of mystic > reality. It makes me think that what you have said has no bearing on what > you believe, in the sense that mystic reality is devoid of concepts and > knowing is the creation of concepts. > Knowledge of, knowledge about or knowledge that etc. X refers to something > that can be known. The whole point of DQ/Mysticism in the MoQ sense is that > it can only be experienced and not known. > Or perhaps I've got it wrong. Anyone else agree or disagree? > > Horse > Contemplating the difference between "experienced" and "known", a faithful old analogy popped into my mind - A blind man may "experience" an elephant, but only the sighted can "know" it. We all experience DQ, but none of us has eyes that see. Perhaps some eyesalve then? (Rev. 3:18) I'm headed for the hills where it grows in abundance. Back in three days. Yours, John Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
