On Dec 30, 2010, at 3:54 PM, [email protected] wrote: > [Marsha] >> I took my grandson outside on a > beautiful summer day to introduce him to his yard. "These are flowers. > These are >> leaves. This is a branch. This is a tree trunk. And this whole big > thing is a tree. And there's another." OMG! I was >> indoctrinating him into our > subject-object world view. Will I ever have the chance to put him and all > these things >> back together again? > > Now we're getting somewhere! > If we teach a subject/object language & it leads to a SOM, can it then be > subsumed under the MoQ, as Pirsig claims? > Or must we teach an MoQ language from the start? If so, how do we do this? > Craig
Hi Craig, I could have said to him that his consciousness constructs from patterns of value these leaves, this branch, this tree trunk, this whole tree. Or I could have told him that he is the leaves, branch, tree trunk and the entire tree. Sounds very odd to my ears. - He's learning to read; maybe I should get him a book of koans. Do you have any suggestions? Marsha ___ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
