On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 1:08 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > [Arlo] > > If Bo's MOQ is better than Pirsig's MOQ, > > please explain to me how? > [Platt] > > It [Bo's MoQ] places the conceptually unknown within the moral hierarchy. > > So Pirsig's MoQ doesn't??? >
He tentatively suggests a "Code of Art" level, but quickly retracts. His interpreters attempt to include the conceptually unknown in an "expanded" intellectual level, clearly a self-contradiction. [Platt] > > Otherwise DQ has no home. > > So are you treating DQ as an object? > No. As a value. Platt Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
