On Jan 8, 2011, at 11:30 AM, Andre Broersen wrote:

> Marsha to Andre quoting Anthony's Phd and:
> 
> In Buddhism it is Form is Emptiness, Emptiness is Form.
>    (Heart Sutra)
> 
> Andre:
> So? Is this your 'evidence' or justification for saying DQ=sq? And, if so, 
> how does this add to Pirsig's MOQ? By making a distinction between DQ and sq 
> did Pirsig commit a grave error?
> 




Marsha: 
No, that's a few words from Anthony's PhD to explain that is how RMP 
interpret's it.  -  I know from experience.   


 
___
 

Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html

Reply via email to