Subject: Re: [MD] Changes in 2011
Marsha to Andre quoting Anthony's Phd and: In Buddhism it is Form is Emptiness, Emptiness is Form. (Heart Sutra) Andre: So? Is this your 'evidence' or justification for saying DQ=sq? And, if so, how does this add to Pirsig's MOQ? By making a distinction between DQ and sq did Pirsig commit a grave error? Ron: This seems to be what is being wrestled with, the arrival at the idea that forms are empty of material objective "permanance" which is useful in breaking a static conventional prejudice, but once the point has been made, what sort of meaning is wrought by resting on it? Philosophical discussions should begin here, not end. Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
