Hi Mary,

When you said:

 " As for the dilemma?   Your view of the change thing? Reminds me of being
a little bit pregnant."  I caught your meaning immediately.  But yet, there
is an aspect of the true definition of "static" which carries always the
unseen modifier, "sort of".  Everything that we deem as static, is only *sort
of *static.  I guess I've always known that, but I've never thought about it
much.   And the really interesting fact about this situation, that I also
had never previously considered, is the fact that in that little tiny slice
of time known as "direct experience" has no way of knowing just how static
any particular phenomenon is.  It takes a judgment based on memory over
time in order to comprehend how static something is and whether it's static
enough to be deemed "static".  It's a function of intellect, yes.  But it's
also a completely subjective judgment from a particular point of view.

What bothers me the most is those who have argued against this point in that
they seem to be quite arrogant in their assertions that what they call
static, actually IS static beyond their subjective judgment.  They
absolutize their own egoistic point of view and call anyone who doesn't just
swallow their judgment names like "stupid" and "anti-intellectual" and
"anti-MoQ".

It's a trite saying of an old friend of mine, "discussions produce light;
arguments produce heat".  When I come looking for enlightening discussion,
and I end up with heated argument... well, I look at that as some kind of
clue that I've stumbled upon a sore point of some kind.  It makes me want to
back off to keep from fueling the flames, but on the other hand, I hate to
miss the throughtful responses of those like you and Mark that actually stop
and think about things rather than attack and parrot their
mutually-reinforced preconceptions.

So thanks for that.

John the non-pregnant
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html

Reply via email to