Some days ago John and Dave had this exchange:

John
Well, not to get all argumentative about it dave, but like gallileo says,
when something simply is, it is.  And that's all there is to it.

DMB
describing static patterns as "ever-changing" is about as wrong as it gets.

John
Absolutely every single particle of this cosmos in which we dwell, IS
ever-changing, shifting and becoming something different through time.  And
even our ideas about it evolve and shift, so those aren't absolute neither.
In fact, I thought this was your big bugaboo against idealism's postulation
of an absolute?  That there ain't no such animal.  Isn't that a given?

The only thing that is constant, is change.

Ian says -

John, you are being argumentative, and it seems deliberately to miss
the point of the MoQ.

Yes - the only "thing" that is constant is change. I've used the
phrase myself many times in everyday and work contexts - may even be a
chapter title of my masters dissertation ? Yes every "particle" in the
universe is in motion or some state of flux. But that's "things"
(objects / subjects) in the SOMist world, not static patterns.

Static patterns are static in so far as the relations, even dynamic
relations between dynamic things are static patterns of quality in
those relations. You may need to look at patterns upon patterns to
find the static quality, but when you find them they are static
patterns. Yes existing patterns evolve and new patterns emerge, but
they are static compared to the interactions of the subjects and
objects involved.

Ian



On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 4:45 PM, John Carl <[email protected]> wrote:
> Well, not to get all argumentative about it dave, but like gallileo says,
> when something simply is, it is.  And that's all there is to it.
>
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html

Reply via email to