dmb says to John:

And the larger point here, in case you missed it, is that we cannot have any 
kind of successful communication without a certain stability of meaning. And in 
this case we are talking about the MOQ first distinction. Who could possibly 
deny that it is bad to be confused about these central terms? Who thinks it's 
helpful or useful to use definitions that are opposite from the one commonly 
used by Pirsig, James and english dictionaries? 


Like I said, this doesn't even rise to the level of a philosophical discussion. 
It's just about thinking and talking badly. It's about ruining the possibility 
of any real communication. We trade in words and ideas here and so this is NOT 
nit picking about typos or spelling errors. To misconstrue the basic meaning of 
these terms is intellectually paralyzing. When confused concepts are being used 
at that basic level, the conversation is going nowhere fast.

Ron:
Right, it is better to have meaning than not. Meaning, may be argued as 
synonomous with Quality, 

that which has no meaning has no Quality.

But what it looks like to me is the presentation of the idea that the one is 
the 
many and the many are
the one. A truth about "Good".  A truth that should be the root of all meaning.

The Problem is that often the idea is rested apon as an ultimate solution 
not a generator.

opening up another question, is Quality a solution, a destination or is it a 
direction finder, a star to steer by
it would seem, given that we know that Quality is the process of betterness, it 
would be continuous to 

link it to the viewpoint of guide. Making meaning linked to betterness.

It would seem to me that the value placed on "meaningless-ness" is a static 
one. A Dogma.

Now it should not be forgotten that it is a crucal part in a process of 
understanding  but it is not meant
to be rested apon.

Intelligibilty is better than unintelligibility.














                        
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html



      
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html

Reply via email to