On Apr 10, 2011, at 10:10 AM, X Acto wrote:
> Dan:
> There are not many MOQs. There is one, as far as I am concerned. Any
> other theory should be called by another name, otherwise it leads to
> confusion.
>
> Ron:
> Thats a real absolute authoritative view, Marsha's not going to like that too
> much.
Marsha:
The MoQ as we discuss it is an Intellectual Static Pattern of Value, and is
subject to
an individual's static history and the dynamics of the experience. RMP knows
that
there cannot be an absolute MoQ. In this quote, he acknowledges the MoQ's
vulnerability. I may agree with Dan on many issues, but that he has an
absolute
understanding of the Quality of the MoQ, I have to say: No. No. No. - On
the other
hand, I think there is great value in trying to deepen ones understanding, and
if one
can kill those intellectual patterns even for a few minutes, than great good
has been
accomplished.
“There is the Quality of Zen and there is the Quality of the MOQ and they are
not the same thing anymore because the MOQ is an intellectual static pattern
and already it’s been polluted plenty to get into that pattern. And all of a
sudden you’re taking sides and things... You’re picking and choosing and in Zen
you’re not supposed to do that! I’ll give you that koan: ‘the way is not
difficult but it avoids picking and choosing.’ That’s a famous koan: the
quality that is Quality is arrived at not by picking and choosing.”
http://robertpirsig.org/AHP.htm
___
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html
