Hello everyone
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 9:29 AM, X Acto <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Dan,
> You seem to me to be implying that since values are consistant in their
choices
> they
> are incapable of altering those choices. That static patterns can not change
>and
> we
> can not effect change in them.
Dan:
What I think the MOQ says is that static quality patterns cannot
change by themselves. They change in response to Dynamic Quality. I
believe RMP brings this up in the discussion about the Zuni brujo.
Thank you,
Ron:
The koan of the Brujo is a good case in point to bring up Dan. The tribe was
ready for a change.
the conditions were right for the Brujo. Static patterns were already changing.
The Brujo also
stuck around, got involved and changed the way people thought and the way
things
were done
he did'nt sit sazen somewhere and cop out on a mountain top with some sort of
moral victory.
Too cool for school.
He aligned intellectual patterns with dynamic quality.
Now I'm going to attack how you are using the quote of static patterns
change in response to dynamic quality. It is a cause and effect relationship
you seem to be placing on the meaning that tends to be anchored in
objective suppositions. In the inerest of clarity, is this what you mean when
you use the term?
Thanks Dan
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html
