On Apr 17, 2011, at 9:38 AM, X Acto wrote: > > >> >>> >>> "In all sexual selection, Lila chooses, Dynamically, the individual >>> she wants to project into the future. If he excites her sense of >>> Quality she joins him to perpetuate him into another generation, and >>> he lives on. But if he's unable to convince her of his Quality-if he's >>> sick or deformed or unable to satisfy her in some way-she refuses to >>> join him and his deformity is not carried on." [LILA} >>> >>> Dan comments: >>> >>> Here, RMP is saying that choosing is a Dynamic activity, one that >>> cannot be defined in so many words. All sexual selection, or natural >>> selection if you will, is determined by Lila and her Dynamic choice. >>> Our bodies know this instinctively. Intellectually, "we" have only >>> been around a short time compared to the cells that make up "our" >>> bodies. >>> >>> Dan >> >> >> Hi Dan, >> >> >> Either the 'Cartesian self' is an illusion or it is not. For me it is an >> illusion. Lila doesn't choose anything. Preferences are there >> reflecting her biological static patterns of value. Does Lila >> psychologically choose? No. SHE may build a story about such >> and such an attraction and the results, but SHE is not in control. >> At least as she is presented in the story-line. > > Hi Marsha > > But Lila is in control, if the cartesian me is an illusion and the me based > on the four levels of value is more real then the static pattern of value > named > "Lila" then Lila IS in control. > -Ron
Yes, Ron, I agree it is an illusion, but I'm not sure that is clearly understood by all. That just might be the paradox created by our language. But I'm not sure. Marsha ___ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
