Andre, There might be many static "betterments" in comparison of various factors when weighing two different options. And we often take the aggregate of these static comparisons as indicators of which is the best of the two. But still, we are only guessing. Often we guess with nebulous intuitive leaps that can't really be pinned to any specific, known static pattern. It's future experience which reveals whether we made the good choice or not. Sometimes, all the static weight in the world is on the wrong side.
Ascertaining latches is very akin to ascertaining improvement. We fall into attachment too easily. John On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 12:16 PM, Andre Broersen <[email protected]>wrote: > John to Mary: > > > Disagree Mary. > > Betterness is not due to static patterns. > > Perception of any Static patterns of value is due to betterness. > > Andre: > Disagree John. How do you know something is 'better' if not relation into > something static, something that is already there which has been improved > upon? How can you ascertain the improvement unless the latch? > > > > > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org/md/archives.html > Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
